Are the Experts Working for Jose Baez Superior to the Experts Working for the State of Florida?

17 Feb

Jose Baez, defense attorney for Casey Anthony accused of murdering her two-year-old daughter, spoke to the press on December 13, 2008 about the professional quality of the defense experts.  His comments may be found at the following link.

http://cayleeanthony.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/anthony-defense-team-gets-first-look/

Jose Baez: “We should be able to observe the scene.  This isn’t just anyone we’re allowing in,  we’re allowing in people they come to when they train.”

“We should be able to observe the scene” – Mr. Baez refers to the discovery site of a body which remained unidentified at the time Mr. Baez made his comments.

“This isn’t just anyone we’re allowing in” – Mr. Baez places himself and unknown others refered to by “we” in charge of who is allowed “in”.  The people Mr. Baez feels “should be allowed to observe” are not “just anyone”, therefore they are someone, presumably someone of importance.

“we’re allowing in people they come to when they train.” – Mr. Baez is obsessed with the notion he controls who is allowed “in” and who is kept out, even though he began his comments by acknowledging he personally is not “able to observe the scene”.

“people they come to when they train.” – This is who Mr. Baez would allow “in”.  Mr. Baez asserts his team of experts is comprised of the “people” who trained the state experts.  But he makes his assertion in a weak manner by employing the phrase “they come to”.  Mr. Baez does not state outright these individuals are the same individuals who trained the state experts, he hints it could be so.  Mr. Baez attempts to convince those listening to his comments the experts working for the defense are superior in expertise to the state experts.

We have learned Mr. Baez feels access to an active crime scene investigation should be determined by the relative experience level of an individual regardless of their association or lack of association with a legitimate law enforcement organization.

We have learned Mr. Baez desperately wanted to be in charge of personnel access to the discovery site of Caylee Anthony’s remains.

We have learned Mr. Baez believes his experts, the most prominent of whom has departed from the defense team, are professionally superior to those utilized by the State of Florida.

Advertisements

25 Responses to “Are the Experts Working for Jose Baez Superior to the Experts Working for the State of Florida?”

  1. Venice February 17, 2011 at 2:04 pm #

    Oh Boy…he’s got Channel 2, Channel 9, and Fox. Yippee!

    The only microphone he will be speaking into is the one at the defendants table. In due time…….

  2. Anonymous February 17, 2011 at 4:19 pm #

    Bull-Here is a good article that I think you already posted but in the off chance you didn’t here goes:

    http://www.wftv.com/news/26146110/detail.html

    • shyloh February 17, 2011 at 4:59 pm #

      Not so sure that will work for them now that Laura B. confessed to lying about the TES documents. They may have to try a new twist.

  3. bullstopper February 17, 2011 at 5:05 pm #

    This is a fabulous article on the defense motion to exclude the car stink from trial:

    http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2011/02/14/caylee-anthony-case-defense-moves-to-have-trunk-smell-excluded/

  4. bullstopper February 17, 2011 at 5:09 pm #

    Judge Perry schedules Jose smackdown for Wednesday, March 2, 2011:

    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Setting%20Hearing%20on%20States%20Motion%20to%20Strike%20Def%20Supplemental%20Witness%20List.pdf

    JP basically states Jose and crew failed to follow the previous court orders issued concerning the listing of witnesses, but will give the defense an opportunity to explain themselves next week.

    • Venice February 17, 2011 at 5:13 pm #

      Really???

  5. bullstopper February 17, 2011 at 5:12 pm #

    With only 2 working months left prior to jury selection, Jose and crew file for transcriptions dating as far back as last September:

    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Motion%20and%20Order%20for%20Transcription%20Services.pdf

    • Venice February 17, 2011 at 5:17 pm #

      Pure Class!!

  6. bullstopper February 17, 2011 at 5:18 pm #

    Ashton’s response which includes the phrase “glaringly insufficient” in reference to the defense’s motion to strike chloroform:

    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Motion%20to%20Strike%20Def%20Motion%20to%20Exclude%20Unreliable%20Evidence%20Pursuant%20to%20Fyre%20-%20Chloroform.pdf

    • Venice February 17, 2011 at 5:20 pm #

      Thank God for Bull and this blog!! Truly Honest and Ethical Work!

  7. Venice February 17, 2011 at 5:29 pm #

    Can the defense keep this bull**** up until Game Day allowing them to cry wolf at the last minute?? Anybody know?

  8. 38special February 17, 2011 at 6:53 pm #

    All good questions and article, BullStopper.
    The one that gets me is what if this had NOT been Caylee’s remains. Were his experts freelancing? Who would have paid Baez’s experts had it been some other unfortunate child? They were free that day and wanted to brush up their skills with an unidentified body?

  9. Zoe February 17, 2011 at 6:54 pm #

    March will be an eventful month!
    Another step closer to Justice for Caylee….
    ********************************
    The March wind roars
    Like a lion in the sky,
    And makes us shiver
    As he passes by.

    When winds are soft,
    And the days are warm and clear,
    Just like a gentle lamb,
    Then spring is here.
    – Author Unknown

  10. Anonymous February 17, 2011 at 7:25 pm #

    Bull-Thank you for posting all those links. The Hinky Meter is just a wealth of information and clarity relative to scientifc analysis. There is just no one like Val when it comes to educating her readers about the significance of what both sides will attempt to present and why it’s “just speculation”-Baez’s favorite word of late.

    March 2, 2011 should be a very interesting day. Judge Perry is going to say, “Mr Biiiaz, you’re not listening to me. I told you what would happen if things were not done. You haven’t listened in the past (smiles with eyes wide open)but today that’s all you have to do. When I rule you will listen – there will be no time given for a rebuttal. This trial will move forward and there will be a jury seated and opening statements will begin at 9AM sharp on May 16, 2011. You will not have all the witnesses you want but you will have to do the best you can.”

  11. damagdpets February 17, 2011 at 7:39 pm #

    Bull, I also want to thank you for posting the links. I love the way the prosecution writes a motion or response. The methodical way it’s done and the case law behind it are outstanding.

  12. shyloh February 17, 2011 at 8:29 pm #

    I am finally able to open the PDF files. I downloaded adobe.com/go/getair and it works now. This is for whoever else was having the same problem. I also use Mizilla Firefox.

    Carry on……………….>>>>

  13. annie February 18, 2011 at 1:19 am #

    there is going to be a mistrial or bozo will get kicked off.there will be maybe an appeal as welll as other hopes.

  14. Anonymous February 18, 2011 at 8:02 am #

    I think stumbling through pretrial towards a mistrial is there goal. This trial is ‘Life on the installment plan’.

    • 38special February 18, 2011 at 1:35 pm #

      Anonymous~ way back during kc’s conversation with her babysitter, Tracy M, that’s what she said was the ‘plan’. A mistrial. Now it was just talk but kc had to hear this from Baez’ mouth (and she’s dumb cause mistrial wouldn’t mean she walks free, it only delays the inevitable)) so IF that’s true and IF it comes to pass I hope it can be proved that it was a deliberate act on DT part. He’s already been shown to be reckless and unethical so it wouldn’t be surprising…time will tell

  15. Anonymous February 18, 2011 at 9:44 pm #

    38Special-Judge Perry said sometime in January that he was prepared to go through two trials. He also mentioned to Mr Baez that there were lawyers who would be evaluating his performance(his JAC invoices, etc)Not a veiled threat but a serious admonition.

    Do you notice the case is moving forward without all the jackasses that Mr Baez spent such valuable time on during the first 2 years? Before we heard about crackpot bloggers, certain searchers, river, skye and the moon up above, Mr MacIntyre, Mr Thompson, wifes who married a pedophile, wife beater and kidnapper,”the dream team”, Ms Anthony’s blouses, her letters to gal pal Adam and those willing to pay for her shampoo and doritos.And of course the “best in the business” have come and gone.

    Now that the noise has been turned off his incompetence is taking center stage.

    • bullstopper February 18, 2011 at 10:52 pm #

      I think it is more laziness than incompetence.

      His motions are sloppily written, far too broad, and poorly researched. They display all the symptoms of a teenager’s rushed homework.

      He is like a butcher trying to be a surgeon. He hacks away at the law while Ashton and LDB use the smallest and least amount of strokes.

      But I can’t tell if he is incompetent and really doesn’t know what to do or he just won’t spend the necessary time to do it properly. He obviously never prepares in advance for a hearing and he never learns his lesson no matter how many times he fumbles in front of the court because he forgot to bring this or that. Is it stupidity or laziness?

      • 38special February 19, 2011 at 1:11 am #

        I’d be willing to say that it’s laziness borne out of stupidity.
        He is stupid, if he wasn’t some of these lessons would sink in purely from repetition. How many times has he been schooled on motions….enough that just by watching it on tv I bet I could write one and know that there should be some law cited. Does he? No, he commits the same mistakes over and over.

        His stupidity must allow him to be lazy…sort of ‘a why bother’ attitude, too much trouble, I’m busy..etc. For over 2 yrs he has done really nothing, in my book that’s the epitome of both stupid & lazy. Idiot.

  16. Anonymous February 19, 2011 at 11:49 am #

    Let’s take a look at unseating a judge. Not much heavy lifting when his client decided the judge must go.Mr Baez simply does what he does best-taint everyone and anyone that he and Ms Anthony do not like with the “appearances of impropriety”.

    Judge Strikand is a seasonded Judge and a fully integrated individual who has years of experience and the ability to recognize people like Ms Anthony. He knows “they have the ability to parasitically rob anyone of their dignity” (Hare).

    You have to be pretty stupid to expose how incredibly lazy you are. When people talk about his lack of credibility it will never be because he didn’t know criminal procedure/case law. When Cindy was finally silenced others came forward willing to take over where she left off. What a total disgrace.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: